Moldies Call to Action: Email The Beast

5683575389_de66f8d2a7_b

The Daily Beast’s Farah Khan recently wrote the controversial article “Your not a doctor, Why is the Internet so Obsessed with Toxic Mold?” It seemed to come out of left field. I later learned it came straight out of 2006. 

Sharon Kramer, who has been on the front lines fighting the scientific fraud issue that, “toxic mold does not harm” consistently states the exact literature Kahn chose to cite in her recent article was used by defense lawyers as a weapon of mass destruction in toxic mold cases years ago. It is and always has been a heavily criticized publication. This source of information is also severely outdated. Not only was it published over 10 years ago it has also been sunsetted. I asked Sharon to explain what sunsetted meant. She said “Any defense attorney or expert who would try to hold it out in court as current accepted science, would have egg on their face. They’d get discredited.” 

Sharon Kramer writes to the The Daily Beast

The advice this doctor is giving is out of date and dangerous to promote as current accepted science.  It doesn’t appear that she even read much before she wrote — including the references she cited. It states at the bottom of the very last page, “AAAAI Position Statements and Work Group Reports are not to be considered to reflect current AAAAI standards or policy after five years from the date of publication. For reference only. February 2006.”

Kahn tells readers that “an internet search for ‘toxic mold’ will result in hundreds of scary warnings and ‘studies,’ but few are based in science—and many are motivated by profit.”  

Kahn not only dismisses hundreds of studies she also dismisses her patient who is concerned toxic mold might be causing his liver condition. This patient asks a valid question,  “Doc, do you think any of this has to do with the mold that was all over my old apartment building?” She says “This was not the first—and certainly won’t be the last—patient to ask about mold. Ultimately, I told this patient the same thing I told all the others: Mold exposure was not responsible for your health problems.” 

Sharon Kramer writes to The Daily Beast

“Also, I believe it’s generally accepted knowledge that aspergillus is a common fungus found in water damaged buildings and it does have the capability to cause liver damage.  This would be particularly true if one’s immune system and liver were already (immuno) compromised from alcohol consumption.”

Dr. Janette Hope who happens to be our mold doctor, wrote a journal article which stated, Aflatoxin is the leading cause of liver cancer in many developing countries. Hope is a top environmental doctor and was in the top 3% of her class at UCLA.   Dr Hope Journal Article 

I think it is important to note that Kahn is doing her endocrinology fellowship at Emory, a top research university. They have very close ties and work closely with the CDC.  Emory Collaboration with CDC  

Many mold victims wanted to respond to this article, but comments are disabled for this post. So we will have to resort to writing the editor. 

editorial@thedailybeast.com

Daily Beast Article-Farah Kahn

 

4 thoughts on “Moldies Call to Action: Email The Beast”

  1. Sadly, there is nothing that can be done, to have the Daily Beast article revised or removed, due to the way the internet functions. The out-of-date source that the article’s author used, to write her misleading article, will exist as an internet reference source until the end of time. The way the internet was created failed to provide a way to delete information when that information was updated by the source of that information. Both the updated, and the out-of-date information remain searchable by Google, and the selection of which of those two sources to believe is left to the intelligence of the web surfer. The “sunsetting” of the old source has always been misunderstood by my dear friend Sharon Kramer. Sunsetting only means that you can no longer find the old source when you search that one website. The sunsetting was an automatic procedure of the publisher of the out-of date article, not a great victory for Sharon’s persistent attacks and legal maneuvers. After a pre-set number of years, that publisher stated that the old information was no longer the current opinion of “their” group, and would no longer appear when searched for on their web site. In some instances, when such a removal is made, Google informs the searcher that she is viewing a “cached” article, and not an article that appears on an active web site. But not in all cases. An example of this, are my 20 year old listings on the singles dating web sites that I created over 20 years ago. On those sites my photo still shows a nice full head of black hair and a flat stomach. I am forever young, in spite of my repeated requests to those dating services to delete me from their membership.

  2. First of all, let me say that Joe Salowitz is in NO WAY a dear friend of mine, nor does he understand what it means when a medical association “sunsets” position statements. That would most likely be because he didn’t work with Dr. Hodgson of OSHA for a couple of years to cause the sunsetting of the ACOEM mold statement. He doesn’t have the behind the scenes emails in his possession of what it took to get it down. I do.

    People like Joe who are always willing to voice their opinions, but actually do ZERO to remove false science from policies, medical school teachings and toxic torts over the mold issue, are who make it difficult on us who actually do cause changes in policy.

    It’s people like Joe who aid the false science to continue to cause the institutionalized discrimination to continue. Nope. Joe Salowitz is no friend of mine and if you are trying to get help from a mainstream physician (who is still being misinformed) Joe is no friend of your’s either. He might as well work for the defense in mold litigation.

    This article by the Emory Fellow is what’s known as “astroturfing”. What Joe is doing, while trying to present that he is my friend, is the same.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *