My Toxic Mold Illness Diary: January 28

(Day 40 of treatment on the Brewer Protocol.)

The first month I did the Protocol, it was hit and miss at best. The nausea was wicked and so I had to start and stop while my primary care doc and I set out to figure out what to do.

With some trial and error I found that it’s most definitely the Chelating RX that’s causing stomach upset. I don’t suspect it happens to everyone. Not sure. But, as I have ulcers anyway I’m not surprised that it was not helping matters.

Chelating RX

I also went back on Sucralfate and Doc has made sure I have plenty of Zofran if I need it. The upswing to the Sucralfate is that it’s on Dr. Brewer’s list of things that can help me eliminate these mycotoxins.

So, moving forward I plan to write here every few days or so to keep track of my progress for myself and Dr. Brewer, but also to share with all of you who want to know what this process is like.

Yesterday I did my treatment like a good girl. Every time I fire that nasal rocket of medicine up my nose, I complain. And, every time I complain, I remind myself that in less than a year I am likely to be feeling better than I have in many, many years.

I also remind myself of the kind of suffering in this world that is so much greater than mine. Helps me force myself off the pity-potty.

Below is a photo of the package I’ll be receiving each month throughout this process. In the beginning I thought it was going to cost about $70 a month. As it turns out it’s more like $90. Even at that price for 12 months, the cost will be only $1080. All I have to do is compare that number with the thousands and thousands of dollars I’ve spent on docs and scans and tests in just the last few years alone, and I am happy to give them ninety bucks.

The meds to treat my toxic mold illness each day.

In addition to the Chelating RX, I open a blue capsule of Nystatin, mix it with a little distilled water and saline and inhale. I don’t think I’m having any side effects of the Nystatin at all.

I woke up this morning feeling very much like I’d consumed several cups of coffee in my sleep – jittery and shaky and with a general feeling of anxiety. I’m not sure what that’s about honestly. Maybe I’m sleep-caffeinating. 🙂

The great news for this day is that I haven’t yet had to take any Zofran at all and it’s nearing supper time.  The crappy news is that I looked at myself in my magnifying mirror while wearing my glasses. An old, sick woman with sallow skin and dull eyes was in there… and it makes me sad. I have aged like no other in the last ten years.

These two things should never be used together. Ever.

Wherever you are, I hope you’re finding the strength within  you to keep moving toward wellness… whatever that looks like for you. If you’d like some support, or you have a zillion questions about toxic mold illness, I encourage you to join our closed Facebook group by clicking here.

Front Loading Washing Machines & Mold

Is your washing machine growing hidden mold? Thousands of consumers say yes. There is a design flaw in some of the machines that create a super inviting space for mold to grow and it would appear it’s next to impossible to clean it appropriate.

Below is some information regarding which front-loading washing machines may be harboring mold, and the class action lawsuit you may want to join.

Is your washing machine making your family sick? It's very possible.

Front Load Washer Lawsuits

(source: Lieff

Consumers charge that their front-load washers have serious design defects that:

  • cause them to accumulate mold, mildew, and other biological debris
  • render them unable to clean themselves of this mold, mildew, and biological debris
  • produce an odor (from mold) that permeates the washing machines and the consumers’ homes
  • produce an odor on clothes and other items washed in the machines

Consumers also claim that although they have spent money for repairs and other purported remedies, none of those remedies have actually solved the problem.

 Front-loading washing machines that are known to harbor mold and have been named in a lawsuit:

Whirlpool front-load washers sold between 2001 and December 2008, without a steam feature:


Sears/Kenmore front-load washers sold between 2001 and December 2008, without a steam feature:


LG front-load washers sold between August 1, 2003-December 31, 2007, without a steam feature:

  • WM2077CW
  • WM2277HW
  • WM3677HW
  • WM1212CW
  • WM1814CW
  • WM2032HW

Bosch front-loading washers:


Consumer Reports:  Court allows lawsuit against washer manufacturers to continue.


Fla. firefighters test positive for toxic mold exposure

VERO BEACH, Fla.  Two firefighters have tested positive for toxic mold exposure, and the firefighters’ union believes old, run-down fire stations are to blame.

“They had all types of toxins in their body,” said John O’Connor, president of the local chapter of the International Association of Firefighters.

The two firefighters worked at Station No. 7 in Vero Beach and Station No. 10 in Fellsmere. In recent years, O’Connor said the firefighters have been complaining about leaky roofs at their stations, as well as mold and dead rats in the ceiling.”We became very concerned when a lot of guys were complaining about watery eyes, upper respiratory infections, runny noses,” O’Connor said.

Full story:  Firefighters test positive for toxic mold exposure


WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality: Dampness and Mould

In my ongoing desire to learn about mold and how it has impacted robbed me of a healthy life, I continue to pour over information that is available. As you read the summary of the World Health Organization’s report regarding dampness and mold, my notes are in bold and the emphasis is mine.

In short, the best way to prevent a mold related illness? Don’t live or work in a place that has mold. (Face palm, right?) The World Health Organization also says that currently they really can’t figure out what the numbers are as it pertains to people who are made sick by mold.

Summary of 2009 WHO Report: WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality: Dampness and Mould

In 2009 the World Health Organization issued a report, entitled WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality: Dampness and Mould, of its study of the latest investigations regarding dampness, mold, and indoor quality.  In the report WHO provides the following summary of its conclusions:

  • Sufficient epidemiological evidence is available from studies conducted in different countries and under different climatic conditions to show that the occupants of damp or mouldy buildings, both houses and public buildings, are at increased risk of respiratory symptoms, respiratory infections and exacerbation of asthma. Some evidence suggests increased risks of allergic rhinitis and asthma. Although few intervention studies were available, their results show that remediation of dampness can reduce adverse health outcomes.
  • There is clinical evidence that exposure to mould and other dampness-related microbial agents increases the risks of rare conditions, such as hypersensitivity pneumonitis, allergic alveolitis, chronic rhinosinusitis and allergic fungal sinusitis. (Pneumonitis is a general term that refers to inflammation of lung tissue. Alveolitis is an inflammation in the inner part of the lungs.)
  • Toxicological evidence obtained in vivo (an experiment that is done in vivo is done in the body of a living organism ) and in vitro supports these findings, showing the occurrence of diverse inflammatory and toxic responses after exposure to microorganisms isolated from damp buildings, including their spores, metabolites and components.
  • While groups such as atopic (a predisposition toward developing certain allergic hypersensitivity reactions) and allergic people are particularly susceptible to biological and chemical agents in damp indoor environments, adverse health effects have also been found in nonatopic populations. (Which means people who aren’t predisposed to be allergic are also sick.)
  • The increasing prevalences of asthma and allergies in many countries increase the number of people susceptible to the effects of dampness and mould in buildings.

The conditions that contribute to the health risk are summarized by WHO in the Executive Summary as follows:

  • The prevalence of indoor dampness varies widely within and among countries, continents and climate zones. It is estimated to affect 10–50% of indoor environments in Europe, North America, Australia, India and Japan. In certain settings, such as river valleys and coastal areas, the conditions of dampness are substantially more severe than the national averages for such conditions.
  • The amount of water on or in materials is the most important trigger of the growth of microorganisms, including fungi, actinomycetes and other bacteria.
  • Microorganisms are ubiquitous. (Meaning they are invisible to the naked eye and they are everywhere.)   Microbes propagate rapidly wherever water is available. The dust and dirt normally present in most indoor spaces provide sufficient nutrients to support extensive microbial growth. While mould can grow on all materials, selection of appropriate materials can prevent dirt accumulation, moisture penetration and mould growth.
  • Microbial growth may result in greater numbers of spores, cell fragments, allergens, mycotoxins (Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites produced by microfungi that are capable of causing disease and death in humans and other animals), endotoxins, β-glucans and volatile organic compounds in indoor air. The causative agents of adverse health effects have not been identified conclusively, but an excess level of any of these agents in the indoor environment is a potential health hazard.
  • Microbial interactions and moisture-related physical and chemical emissions from building materials may also play a role in dampness-related health effects.
  • Building standards and regulations with regard to comfort and health do not sufficiently emphasize requirements for preventing and controlling excess moisture and dampness.
  • Apart from its entry during occasional events (such as water leaks, heavy rain and flooding), most moisture enters a building in incoming air, including that infiltrating through the building envelope (The building envelope is the interface between the interior of the building and the outdoor environment, including the walls, roof, and foundation) or that resulting from the occupants’ activities.
  • Allowing surfaces to become cooler than the surrounding air may result in unwanted condensation. Thermal bridges (such as metal window frames), inadequate insulation and unplanned air pathways, or cold water plumbing and cool parts of air-conditioning units can result in surface temperatures below the dew point of the air and in dampness.

WHO formulated the following guidelines and presented them in the report Executive Summary:

  • Persistent dampness and microbial growth on interior surfaces and in building structures should be avoided or minimized, as they may lead to adverse health effects.
  • Indicators of dampness and microbial growth include the presence of condensation on surfaces or in structures, visible mould, perceived mouldy odour and a history of water damage, leakage or penetration. Thorough inspection and, if necessary, appropriate measurements can be used to confirm indoor moisture and microbial growth.
  • As the relations between dampness, microbial exposure and health effects cannot be quantified precisely, no quantitative health-based guideline values or thresholds can be recommended for acceptable levels of contamination with microorganisms. Instead, it is recommended that dampness and mould-related problems be prevented. When they occur, they should be remediated (remedied) because they increase the risk of hazardous exposure to microbes and chemicals. (Preventing the growth of mold is the best, but if you find you have mold, get rid of it.)
  • Well-designed, well-constructed, well-maintained building envelopes are critical to the prevention and control of excess moisture and microbial growth, as they prevent thermal bridges and the entry of liquid or vapour-phase water. Management of moisture requires proper control of temperatures and ventilation to avoid excess humidity, condensation on surfaces and excess moisture in materials. Ventilation should be distributed effectively throughout spaces, and stagnant air zones should be avoided.
  • Building owners are responsible for providing a healthy workplace or living environment free of excess moisture and mould, by ensuring proper building construction and maintenance. The occupants are responsible for managing the use of water, heating, ventilation and appliances in a manner that does not lead to dampness and mould growth. Local recommendations for different climatic regions should be updated to control dampness-mediated microbial growth in buildings and to ensure desirable indoor air quality.
  • Dampness and mould may be particularly prevalent in poorly maintained housing for low-income people. Remediation of the conditions that lead to adverse exposure should be given priority to prevent an additional contribution to poor health in populations who are already living with an increased burden of disease.

The guidelines are intended for worldwide use, to protect public health under various environmental, social and economic conditions, and to support the achievement of optimal indoor air quality. They focus on building characteristics that prevent the occurrence of adverse health effects associated with dampness or mould. The guidelines pertain to various levels of economic development and different climates, cover all relevant population groups and propose feasible approaches for reducing health risks due to dampness and microbial contamination. Both private and public buildings (e.g. offices and nursing homes) are covered, as dampness and mould are risks everywhere.


Source:  WHO (2009): WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality: Dampness and Mould. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen.  Executive Summary, pp. xii-xvi. Accessed at